<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter of the Blue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cephalopodcast.com/blog/2009/02/twitter-of-the-blue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cephalopodcast.com/blog/2009/02/twitter-of-the-blue/</link>
	<description>The Mostly Ocean Show</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 23:08:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://cephalopodcast.com/blog/2009/02/twitter-of-the-blue/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cephalopodcast.com/blog/?p=315#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Use Twitter anyway you want. It&#039;s still too new and raw to have any normative behavior. Twitter (and social networks in general) do not scale well. I codified my decision tree for handling Twitter followers &lt;a href=&quot;http://skitch.com/jasonr/bn6mn/twitterdecisiontree&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. It worked well for the first 100-200 people. But as Twitter becomes more popular the only thing I can do to keep up is to block the obvious spammers. Spammers usually have a following to follower ratio of 1000:1. Being a social network friend is not the same as being a friend friend or a friend friend friend. It is a euphemism because these relationships are novel and we lack the vocabulary to describe them more accurately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use Twitter anyway you want. It&#8217;s still too new and raw to have any normative behavior. Twitter (and social networks in general) do not scale well. I codified my decision tree for handling Twitter followers <a href="http://skitch.com/jasonr/bn6mn/twitterdecisiontree" rel="nofollow">here</a>. It worked well for the first 100-200 people. But as Twitter becomes more popular the only thing I can do to keep up is to block the obvious spammers. Spammers usually have a following to follower ratio of 1000:1. Being a social network friend is not the same as being a friend friend or a friend friend friend. It is a euphemism because these relationships are novel and we lack the vocabulary to describe them more accurately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I have joined the Twitter Borg &#171; The Oyster&#8217;s Garter</title>
		<link>http://cephalopodcast.com/blog/2009/02/twitter-of-the-blue/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>I have joined the Twitter Borg &#171; The Oyster&#8217;s Garter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cephalopodcast.com/blog/?p=315#comment-13</guid>
		<description>[...] couldn&#8217;t take being left out any more. First, Jason promised me that  &#8220;social networks like Twitter are just the useful, ciliary filaments you can fling out [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] couldn&#8217;t take being left out any more. First, Jason promised me that  &#8220;social networks like Twitter are just the useful, ciliary filaments you can fling out [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miriam</title>
		<link>http://cephalopodcast.com/blog/2009/02/twitter-of-the-blue/comment-page-/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Miriam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cephalopodcast.com/blog/?p=315#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Hur hur. You said palps. So do you think it&#039;s necessary to use Twitter interactively - that is, to read other people&#039;s Tweets? Or do you think it&#039;s ok to just fling off bits of blogular debris to be nibbled upon by the Twittering masses? It&#039;s the interactive part that intimidates me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hur hur. You said palps. So do you think it&#8217;s necessary to use Twitter interactively &#8211; that is, to read other people&#8217;s Tweets? Or do you think it&#8217;s ok to just fling off bits of blogular debris to be nibbled upon by the Twittering masses? It&#8217;s the interactive part that intimidates me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://cephalopodcast.com/blog/2009/02/twitter-of-the-blue/comment-page-/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 02:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cephalopodcast.com/blog/?p=315#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Sorry, just some unnecessary peer pressure directed your way. We think your blog is grand and just wish there were more bits of Oyster Garter shedding off onto the Net for us to filter feed.

So how do I keep up? Being sedentary helps. Some days I can almost feel the byssal threads adhering me to the chair in front of my laptop. I currently use Twitterific + Growl on my Mac for most tweeting. Others swear by Twhirl or Tweetdeck. Having an iPhone helps, but isn&#039;t really necessary. I rarely use the actual Twitter web interface. My other tip for managing it all is to eschew Facebook whenever possible.

But if you think of Oyster Garter as your brand, then social networks like Twitter are just the useful, ciliary filaments you can fling out to draw in more nutritious particles (readers) to your real palps (blog). It is not a bad idea to stake a user id in as many networks as you can (digg, stumbleupon, facebook, youtube, etc.), even if you don&#039;t have time right now to develop them. I suppose it could be considered cynically, but it is just more arrows pointing to your virtual door. And by joining and using the networks, you at least have a little control over which way those arrows point.

As for purpose of Twitter, this video does a decent job of explaining some of the gist:
Twitter in Plain English - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddO9idmax0o

One of the realities of living in a digital world is dealing with new interfaces and means of communicating on a daily basis. It is easy to get fatigued and overwhelmed by it all. Also, it is OK not to join.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, just some unnecessary peer pressure directed your way. We think your blog is grand and just wish there were more bits of Oyster Garter shedding off onto the Net for us to filter feed.</p>
<p>So how do I keep up? Being sedentary helps. Some days I can almost feel the byssal threads adhering me to the chair in front of my laptop. I currently use Twitterific + Growl on my Mac for most tweeting. Others swear by Twhirl or Tweetdeck. Having an iPhone helps, but isn&#8217;t really necessary. I rarely use the actual Twitter web interface. My other tip for managing it all is to eschew Facebook whenever possible.</p>
<p>But if you think of Oyster Garter as your brand, then social networks like Twitter are just the useful, ciliary filaments you can fling out to draw in more nutritious particles (readers) to your real palps (blog). It is not a bad idea to stake a user id in as many networks as you can (digg, stumbleupon, facebook, youtube, etc.), even if you don&#8217;t have time right now to develop them. I suppose it could be considered cynically, but it is just more arrows pointing to your virtual door. And by joining and using the networks, you at least have a little control over which way those arrows point.</p>
<p>As for purpose of Twitter, this video does a decent job of explaining some of the gist:<br />
Twitter in Plain English &#8211; <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddO9idmax0o" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddO9idmax0o</a></p>
<p>One of the realities of living in a digital world is dealing with new interfaces and means of communicating on a daily basis. It is easy to get fatigued and overwhelmed by it all. Also, it is OK not to join.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miriam</title>
		<link>http://cephalopodcast.com/blog/2009/02/twitter-of-the-blue/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Miriam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 02:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cephalopodcast.com/blog/?p=315#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll twitter when you all share your amazing time management skills. Seriously, between blogs and Facebook, how do you fit in Twitter? I don&#039;t have a snazzy internet phone, so that&#039;s not an option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll twitter when you all share your amazing time management skills. Seriously, between blogs and Facebook, how do you fit in Twitter? I don&#8217;t have a snazzy internet phone, so that&#8217;s not an option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

